|
|
WARNING: THE FOLLOWING PASSAGES ARE PROBABLY OF NO INTEREST
TO ANYONE BUT THE AUTHOR HIMSELF. PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK…READING
BEYOND THIS POINT MAY RESULT IN ENUI INDUCED VOMITING.
Child's Play
The idea of musicalizing a contemporary adult version of the
Jack and Jill nursery rhyme occurred to me several years ago,
but I couldn’t wrap my mind around a hook. Although the idea continued
to nag at me, I abandoned the idea and moved on to other projects. In
the Spring of 2000, I was exploring subjects for a children’s
musical and thought I had settled on putting a new spin on Alice
In Wonderland and/or Alice Through The Looking Glass.
In researching the many nursery rhymes used in Lewis Carroll’s
classic tales, I began thinking how interesting it might be to expand
and musicalize one of them. The obvious choice seemed to be the most
famous—Jack and Jill.
Like most people I only knew the first stanza of the beloved children’s
tale. Once I read the second stanza, which is rather bizarre even for
a nursery rhyme, my imagination started working. I became very interested
in nursery rhyme analysis. Who would have thought that so many educated
ADULTS would spend so much time thinking about nursery rhymes? But alas,
I found books, internet sites, and magazine articles dedicated to every
aspect of this nursery rhyme. Discussed topics include the sexual implications
of Jack and Jill’s sojourn up the hill, the intended metaphor
for maturation, women’s contribution to the downfall of men, and
most importantly, the comparison and contrast between nursery rhymes
and fairy tales.
I suddenly realized that nursery rhymes weren’t kids’ stuff…they
were serious business. Furthermore, it seemed that all of Mother Goose’s
short versed tales had been put under this much scrutiny, and I immediately
read the full versions of every nursery rhyme ever written. The idea
of musicalizing Jack and Jill in a new and unorthodox way was
finally becoming clear and where I had begun looking for a children’s
musical, I ended with a pretty strong concept for a full-length “grown
up” musical. I had found my hook: nursery rhymes vs. fairy tales.
Now, if nursery rhymes really had as much substance as scholars and
enthusiasts were braying about, then why were they so short changed?
I mean, they really are trivialized next to fairy tales. What if it
was my life? Wouldn’t I rather have the grandeur of a fairy tale?
The existence of an actual storyline? My own book instead of one poem
in a collection? Yes, damn it! I would! I would want a fairy tale!
Considering that Into The Woods already explored the fairy
tale world and cracked the façade of “happily ever after,”
I wanted to stay as far away from concentrating on fairy tales in Jack
& Jill as possible (Outside of one song in which Jill tells
“the truth” about all of the fairy tale heroines, I tried
to keep the fairy tale references to a minimum in favor of grounding
the characters firmly in Nursery Rhyme Land). However, because Jack
and Jill aspire to turn their nursery rhyme into a fairy tale, I thought
it important to research fairy tales, and key into their allure, their
sexiness, their magic. Not only did I read Grimm and Hans Christian
Anderson, but I thought it valuable to peruse Aesop’s fables,
which led to Jack’s plea, “Get on the phone to Aesop ASAP…and
make things happen!”
The Goose Is Born
It was finally time to write this musical. I began by brainstorming
a list of words, phrases, and images that I thought of when given the
themes of nursery rhymes and fairy tales. One thing I concluded from
this exercise was that similarly to all of the intricate analysis of
these rhymes, everything would be initially simple in name and function,
but ultimately over-complicated. For instance, although I knew my characters’
world was going to simply be called Nursery Rhyme Land, it was important
to create a very real world with rules, social norms, and hierarchy.
A hierarchy that begins and ends with Mother Goose.
It was decided that Mother Goose would be a fowl with a sick sense
of humor who ruled Nursery Rhyme Land and wrote all of the rhymes, consequently
deciding the lives of all of her subjects. The only way to escape was
to be deemed worthy of a fairy tale; a decision assumed to be Mother
Goose’s. I was certain that I did not want Mother Goose to appear
in the musical. Rather, I wanted to make her presence so strongly felt
that she would become God-like or reminiscent of an unseen killer in
a psychological thriller. Always keeping the appearance of a loving
mother but labeled a tyrant by many, her implications are wide and open
to interpretation.
Jack and Jill
After developing this force with no stage time, I had to decide on the
characters that would actually have lines and songs. Obviously, Jack
and Jill were my leads, and I knew long ago that they would be adults,
not children (making them children was part of Mother Goose’s
cover up). Outside of that, I was unclear on who else I needed to tell
their story, or even what their story was. If you look back on my notes,
there are dozens of nursery rhyme characters mentioned including wolves
that trap Jack and Jill up on the hill. All of these characters provided
great one-liners or visual gags, but weren’t functional for two
acts. I went back to Jack and Jill. What did I want their story to say?
I wanted their tale to have resonance with the audience; something
that could have significance in modern times, and not be just some cute
spin on a kids’ poem. When talking about a recent setback in her
life, a woman I know once said, “I’ve played it by the rules!
This shouldn’t be so hard.” That statement inspired what
the story grew into and ended up making Jill the protagonist over Jack.
The fears, questions, and regret that filled that statement filled Jill.
A story about a woman so determined to obtain a goal and so fearful
of what she’ll become if she doesn’t obtain it that she
destroys a person offering a different dream. Of course, in order to
be a musical, I would supply her with redemption in the end. Add to
that a land of talking animals, some great songs, and comedy, and I
could call it a day.
Jill was so clearly complex and complete from the get-go. Acidically
biting, reluctantly vulnerable, and overly intelligent; the child of
a broken home; a working professional, an internist to be exact; and
attractive. Jill was going to be a fighter. In the course of the show
she would learn what to fight for.
Jack wasn’t as clear to me in the beginning, and since he shared
her dream, he started out as callous and tunnel-visioned as Jill. That
had to change. It didn’t feel right on Jack. And then their big
difference hit me: whereas the dream made Jill sad and fearful, Jack
found the dream exciting and hopeful. The rest of Jack fell into place:
he was open, honest, heartfelt, optimistic, and naïve; he worked
with his hands (he started out as a plumber, but I soon changed him
to a gardener to better fit in with the ending); and attractive. Jack
would be the perfect doormat for Jill. In the course of the show Jack
would learn how to be a fighter.
The Others
After I brainstormed song ideas and outlined their story, it
became clear that the only other characters that were needed were one
person for Jack to talk to about Jill, and one person for Jill to talk
to about Jack. I set about choosing and creating characters that would
be more than functional, and ended up with Georgy Porgy and Bo Peep.
Each attained a history, but I was going to have to wait and see how
that history fit into the show.
That summer I wrote the lyrics to “Bo Peep’s Lament.”
Part of the reason that I chose her as a character was to use the play
on words in that song because I felt that it could best illustrate Mother
Goose’s “fowl” play. After completing the first draft
of the song, I stopped. For no reason that I can remember, I didn’t
touch Jack & Jill for nine months. The reason I found to come back
to it was the composer, Jason Loffredo.
The Music
I knew from the beginning that I wanted the show to have a distinct
musical style, and keeping with the small cast size, I thought that
using a jazz trio would be really cool. Unfortunately, I didn’t
have a composer to work with on the project.
In the summer of 2001, I began working with Jason Loffredo on The
News In Revue in the Berkshires, MA. We started talking about writing
together, and I pulled out “Bo Peep’s Lament.” I explained
my concept for a jazz score, which he liked, and we decided to see how
we worked together. Excited by the mere prospect of a partnership, I
dusted off my notes and began writing a first draft of the script.
Jason composed, asked me to re-write a verse, I did, he went back
to work, we talked through it, he fixed some things, and we had our
first song.
Actually, the band was just a band until Jason made them “BAAA!”
in the middle of Bo Peep’s song. I couldn’t have them in
the world of the characters unless they were characters themselves.
Thus, the Three Blind Mice were born, one of the show’s conventions
that I’m most married to, and which supplied a great many comic
possibilities as I wrote the book.
We wrote diligently through the summer, and by the summer’s
end we had a complete first draft of book and lyrics, and four songs
finished. Over the fall, winter, and spring, I worked out of town and
the distance made it difficult to make any real progress on the show.
Jason managed to write a song or two, and I had a living room reading
and fine tuned the libretto, but it wasn’t until the summer of
2002, when Jason and I worked together again, that we took some great
strides on writing the score.
The work continued through the fall, and we decided that with the
score ¾ finished, we should make a demo recording. Our intention
was to have a sampling of the music that we could give to people to
generate excitement about being part of Jack & Jill’s future.
We gathered extremely talented singers (Daniel Cochran, Katie Adams,
Evan Harrington, Melanie Kann, and Brian Golub) and some kick-ass musicians
(Wil Jordan, Skip Ward, and Joe Choroszewski), rented a studio in New
Jersey, and recorded live on January 27th, 2003.
Recording live was a challenge. We didn’t have the financing
or the time to track anything, and so if one person screwed up a take,
that take was not usable. Also, outside of adding a little reverb and
mastering the whole sound, there was little that could be done to the
takes after the recording date. However, we managed to record all nine
songs in just under eight hours, and finished with a product that both
Jason and I were extremely pleased with.
That pretty much brings us to date, but please keep checking back
as we hope to be able to report more in the very near future.
2/19/04
Show Me The Money Okay, so now the demo
record barely represents the show anymore, which I think is excellent
news. It has been approximately one year since we recorded live in that
little studio in New Jersey, and the show has grown and developed more
than I could have imagined.
In February of 2003, Jason and I started planning for a Spring
reading of Jack & Jill The Musical. We felt that the show was far enough
along to present it and hopefully give audience to a bidding war between
New York’s top producers, all wanting to move us directly to the Shubert.
Thankfully, that didn’t happen, because the show we have now is
infinitely better than the version we did at the reading. But I’m
getting ahead of myself…
Getting Our Ducks In A Row Outside of the
boring challenges of producing the reading ourselves (I could have more
easily given birth to a platypus), the largest and most important “duck”
to get in a row was the cast.
In the role of Jill, we originally had Liz McConahay (Cabaret,
The Full Monty), and we were very excited. If you have seen Liz’s work, you
know that she is an amazing performer with killer comic timing and a
sincerity that captivates. However, in the first week of rehearsals, due
to circumstances beyond anyone’s control, Liz had to back out.
I was a bit panicked. Jill is the lead, extremely challenging vocally
and dramatically. I put calls out and picked my friends’ brains. One
brain proved fruitful—my friend, Daniel Frank Kelly, said that my
description of Jill’s requirements sounded perfect for Felicia Finley
(Aida, The Wild Party, The Life). At the time, Felicia was performing Amneris in
Aida on Broadway and I had no connection to her—no friend in
the ensemble, no former college classmate, nothing!
Let me just impart this word of wisdom that I have learned repeatedly
in this business—“always ask…the worst they can say is ‘no.’”
I got online, looked her name up in the white pages, and cold called
her. I left her a message, and she called me back that same day. We met
for coffee so that I could give her the script/score/demo, and met one
of the sweetest people in New York. She immediately agreed to do the
reading, and has continued to be one of the largest supporters of the
project, consistently going out of her way to help advance the progress
of the piece.
As Jill, let me just say that Felicia embodies everything that Jason and
I wanted in our heroine. Those of you who have seen her perform know that her
voice is amazing (she belts very very high), but her greatest
contribution to Jack & Jill is her quirky sense of humor and stellar
comic timing. From the first rehearsal, I knew she understood the
off-kilter humor of the show, and what’s more, she reveled in it. We had
found a Jill with staying power.
To find out more about Felicia, check out her website at:
http://www.geocities.com/feliciafinley/
Duck...duck...Jack! Equally important was
casting the part of Jack, the part that worried me the most. You see,
Jack has to be played with such extreme sincerity, I feared that he
might come across boring. Since he can’t play the laughs, I was afraid
that Jack’s humor could be lost if the actor didn’t find the funny
essence of our innocent hero.
Enter Jay Douglas (Miss Saigon, The Full Monty).
Originally, Jay was recommended to us by Liz McConahay (see above). We
were down to the wire on this one too, not having found an acceptable
choice for the part. We offered the role to Jay after only a singing
audition, and therefore, didn’t know what to expect from him
acting-wise. I needn’t have worried.
Without exaggerating, I have never had a character and an actor more
married in my mind than in this case. Jay is the embodiment of Jack for
me. His portrayal of the dimwitted but ultimately sagely Jack actually
inspired me to write him an act one soliloquy in the revision. And just
like his co-star, Jay’s belief in the project was staggering—he was
actually a brand new daddy getting about two hours of sleep a night
between caring for the baby with his wife and huddling with his
headphones quietly learning his music in lieu of sleep. Once again, we
had found the perfect performer for the part, and similar to his role,
he has a heart of gold.
The Supporting Fowl The roles of Bo Peep
and Georgy were actually case well before Jack or Jill. In the part of
Bo Peep, I had cast my good friend, Kathy Pecevich, an extremely
talented actress/singer who Jason and I had worked with on The News
In Revue. The wonderful thing about Kathy is that I can hear her
saying the lines before she ever does. It turns out that she would
actually have the hardest role because, as I learned from the reading, Bo
Peep was the least well-written of the characters—But more on that
later.
Georgy Porgy was to be played by Victor Hawks (Urinetown), a
Broadway actor with a booming voice that you feel in your bones and a
virtually endless range. I had worked with Victor years ago in
Rochester, NY, but never really thought of him for Georgy until I saw
him go on for Hunter Foster as Bobby Strong in Urinetown. Outside
of being just plain damn funny, Victor’s musicality and penchant for
vocal fun were aspects of Georgy that we needed to fulfill his function
as narrator and singer of jazz.
Jason and I had decided to use only piano for the reading, but the jazz
trio that the show requires participates throughout the script and
score. Therefore, we had to cast The Three Blind Mice. We managed to get
three very talented performers—Jason Weston (Mamma Mia!), Derek
Gatts, and Brian Golub. Their dedication to the project in roles that
will eventually be filled by musicians was essential and greatly
appreciated.
And The Money Kept Rolling Out A reading
costs about as much as a co-op. Who knew?
Seriously, Jason and I went a great deal over budget. Enter the parents.
Thanks Mom and Dad Falzone and Dad Loffredo. We spent a lot more time
rehearsing than we had anticipated. Mostly on the score. A score that is
very complicated, but which the cast enthusiastically embraced and
worked very hard to master.
Needless to say, there can be no price tag on the amount of knowledge
that came out of the reading. The performance dates being the two days
following the 2003 Tony Awards, we did not receive the amount of
industry attendance that we had hoped for, but in hindsight, I’m glad.
The audience we did have provided reactions and feedback necessary to
move Jack & Jill to its next step, greatly revising the script
and score.
You Have a Mighty Long Duck Yes, yes, the
first act was too long. We hadn’t really had a solid run through to
gauge just how long…and I did cut things…I swear. But alas, I sat there
(stood really…I couldn’t have sat down during the reading if you
staple-gunned my privates to an E-Z Boy) during the first reading and
yearned to make on-the-spot cuts throughout the first half hour of the
show. Oh well.
Getting to the second act, though, was a truly wonderful experience. It
really flowed, was a good length, and had very little “fat” on it.
“Hey!” I thought, “Most shows have to worry about the second act. This
isn’t so bad.”
And it was true. Given my choice of major flaws, I’d take an overwritten
first act with too much exposition in trade for a strong second act with
great payoffs and a solid ending. And that’s what we had.
Opinions Are Like…
…I’ll let you fill in the rest. We had encouraged everyone in the
audience to e-mail us with their feedback and a lot of people did. At
one point, I turned to Jason and said, “If we listen to everything that
somebody liked, we have a hit and we shouldn’t touch a thing; if we
listen to everything that somebody didn’t like, we should start over.”
Don’t get me wrong. We appreciated and thoroughly considered every piece
of feedback that we received. Personally, I was excited to get different
people’s perspectives on the problems I knew existed. However, as all
writers know, only you can sift through all of the opinions and decide
which ones to develop and just how to implement them.
The resounding response to the reading was amazement at how far along
Jack & Jill was for a first reading. Granted, it wasn’t as far along as
we had thought or hoped, but I couldn’t have asked for a bigger sense of
accomplishment or a greater feeling of anticipation and adventure
heading into the rewrites. Jack & Jill’s story had just begun…
To Goose Or Not To Goose
Fortunately, Jason and I were working together again that summer on The
News In Revue in the Berkshires. It proved to be an incredibly
productive summer. I set out to address every moment of the show. The
first issue brought up from the reading was the presence of Mother
Goose. Across the board, everyone wanted to feel her presence in a more
palpable way. It was interesting, I found that most people that actually
wanted to see Mother Goose—to have her as a character—were people 45 and
older. Nobody younger minded that you never saw her.
Either way, I refused. I would work to make her tyranny more felt without
resorting to adding her as a character. I felt very strongly about that,
and wouldn’t fully accomplish that until the next re-write.
The largest problem, of course, was that the top of the show was
exposition heavy. We didn’t get to Jack and Jill’s first meeting quickly
enough. It ended up being less simple than that, but more on that later.
I set about stream-lining the opening number and first scene as well as
re-writing the second song in the show. Little did I realize that I had
produced a different version of the same problem. The up side is the new
second song. Where the show used to have a musically complicated quartet
called “Eyes To The Sky, Feet On The Ground” (okay, perhaps it was
lyrically complicated as well), we now had a Sesame Street-esque ditty
called “Nursery Rhyme Math.” Jason and I were satisfied and we moved on.
Not Flying Solo Anymore
One of my realizations from the reading was how weakly Bo Peep was
written. Or perhaps I should say inconsistently. Those of you who have
read all of this (God help you! Get a life!), remember that I said that
“Bo Peep’s Lament” was written before anything else. Huge problem! The
song is biting, sarcastic, and critical of Mother Goose and the world
she rules over; throughout the rest of the show, Bo Peep is positive and
believes in the land of rhyme. I was so married to this song that I had
overlooked the fact that it was no longer appropriate for Bo Peep’s
character to sing. Not to mention that it slowed the action of the play
like a kidney stone.
Bo Peep’s solo was taken away, and I really beefed up her positive
outlook—something that I couldn’t do before because her lament was
holding me back. With that in mind, I gave Bo Peep a dream too,
something to work for during the show. Given her optimism, she would
believe that once she found all of her sheep, she could get a fairy tale
too.
I cannot tell you how much this flushed out the character of Bo Peep. To
my surprise I didn’t need to take away her quick wit and acerbic
commentary, which was something I was afraid would have to go, but witty
and acerbic people have dreams too. And the best part of all of this was
that it opened up the possibility of adding back in “The Truth About
Fairy Tails” (a Jill solo cut during rehearsals for the reading—see, I
told you I cut stuff!) as a duet between Peep and Jill. How happy was I?
It all worked!
So yes, Bo Peep lost her solo, but she gained a character.
You Don’t Know Jack
Ironically, the title of a song in the show, this was the consensus we
were getting regarding Jack’s character. Or, at least, we don’t know him
soon enough. In the reading version, Jack’s depth doesn’t really emerge
until Act Two. I got a bit of feedback saying that Jack seemed a bit
two-dimensional until the second act. As I mentioned before, I truly
think Jay Douglas’ portrayal of Jack is brilliant, and so I realized
that I had work to do.
I had already wanted to give Jay an Act One solo, but didn’t know what
its function would be. Now I had one. It had to let us into Jack’s
character, pulling from both his past and his present. I decided the
best spot for the song would be his first conversation with Georgy after
meeting Jill. This would be a way for Jack to “win” Georgy over to his
side. At the same time, the audience would get to know Jack a lot better
and honestly believe that love can happen so quickly.
The song is called “I Get It,” a bouncy patter song that reveals a great
deal of depth without robbing Jack of his absurd naiveté. It is actually
one of Act One’s best numbers, and has become one of my favorites in the
show.
A Cut Cut Here, And A Cut Cut There
Here a cut, there a cut, everywhere a cut cut. Boy, did we cut. We cut
whole musical numbers (“Eyes To The Sky, Feet On The Ground,” “Bo Peep’s
Lament,” “There’s Always Something Else,” etc.), we cut reprises, and we
cut verses from almost every one of the songs that remained.
Jason and I worked tirelessly to make every song, every moment
efficient. I read the script twice a week, continuously editing,
cutting, rewording. Jason was pulling his hair out, knowing that when he
heard me run up the stairs that I would have another “brilliant” way of
connecting two important sections while alleviating the need for an
unnecessary one that just happened to be a musical transition. He began
calling me Dr. Frankenstein. We discussed, we argued, we filed for
divorce until we realized we weren’t married…
Regardless, by the end of the summer, we had trimmed the show by
fourteen script pages.
Really Great Baked Goods
Our re-writes continued into the Fall. Jason was finishing “I Get It”
and edits on the score, and I was up to reading the script three times a
week (one of those time, out loud, playing all of the characters). When
all was completed, we decided to have a table reading in November. We
managed to reunite the principle cast with the exception of Victor Hawks
(Jason Weston of mouse fame stepped up to play Georgy) and congregated
at Jason Loffredo’s apartment in Queens (God help us all—the 7 train was
running express into Queens that day due to construction).
Jason taught the new musical material, and when people weren’t learning
material, they enjoyed rice crispie treats that Jason Loffredo had made.
Really GREAT rice crispie treats. Never say that we don’t know how to
keep actors happy. The reading went very well, and when we asked for
feedback, boy did we get it. Both the positive and negative, all
constructive, rushed forth from the cast. I madly took notes to sift
through later, and once again marveled at how much these people believed
in the potential of our show. It was apparent in every compliment, and
even more so in every criticism, and it inspired me to start re-writing
as soon as possible.
Another Openin’…
The biggest problem was still the first 21 pages of the show. I was in a
quandary because basically, the whole opening number and the whole first
scene gave the audience the same information. Now, I was always taught
that in cases like that, let the song do it and cut the scene; but one
of the most consistent responses we got from the June reading was that
the first scene was extremely funny and very strong. What to do?
“Change the opening number!” The cast was unanimous at the table
reading. Ideas began to bounce around the room of how to use the basic
song from the opening number, but alter it structurally and conceptually
to set up Nursery Rhyme Land and impart different information to the
audience. Granted the task was exciting, but it was also daunting. I
couldn’t start it right away…
So the next day I set up camp at The Coffee Pot and began hashing
through the opening number. Four hours later I had a new structure that
encapsulated the births of Jack and Jill, their childhoods, and their
maturation into ingénues. It also introduced Nursery Rhyme Land more
effectively than the old opening, allowing the audience to see the land
in action. In addition, Mother Goose figured prominently in moving the
new opening along (we actually see the events leading to Georgy’s and Bo
Peep’s rhymes being written) which finally addressed the “palpable
Mother Goose issue” in a satisfactory way. All of these changes required
Jason to write a Mother Goose Theme that we would actually end up
implanting throughout the score, a new section for Georgy to sing, a
rhyming patter section to show Jack’s and Jill’s first experiences with
not rhyming, and a myriad of transitions.
What we ended up with was truly wonderful—a visually and contextually
interesting opening number that introduced the show’s world in a very
general way and gradually specified its subject until we rested on Jack
and Jill’s nursery rhyme, which is what the rest of the show would deal
with. In effect, we had created the prologue that I had always intended
the opening number to be. And it only took three and a half years.
Adding Some Fowl Language
In response to the June reading, I had received some flack for the bad
language in the show. I had always written Jill with a potty mouth. It
fit her, it was part of who she was. Georgy and Peep swore too, never
Jack. I thought it was appropriate in order to convey the realness of
these unreal characters. And since nobody could articulate why they
disliked the language, I chalked it up to people just being
oversensitive. I mean, Avenue Q has adult language all over the
place…look at Rent…and if 42nd Street isn’t obscene, well then…well, I
digress.
Needless to say, I disregarded that piece of criticism and moved on. But
at the table reading, Jay Douglas said that the naughty language was
jarring to him. He continued by saying that it threw him “out of the
world.” Suddenly, that made sense. Explaining further, the others
agreed, that it seemed as if Nursery Rhyme Land would have its own set
of taboo words that wouldn’t be shared with our world. So I ran with it.
I didn’t get very far. I rewrote the script giving everyone nursery
rhyme swears, and it didn’t work. It was only funny or cute when Jack
said them. I left if for a few days, and then it hit me! I had to be
consistent with my original concept that sweet, pure Jack would never
curse, and if these new nonsensical words were to truly be considered
“fowl” language, then Jack could never use them. Therefore, all of
Jack’s exclamations went back to “darn,” “drat,” and “geez,” leaving the
coarser “Goosedippit” and “curds and whey!” to the foul-mouthed Jill,
brassy Bo Peep, and macho Georgy. All of a sudden, it worked. I was
thrilled because the whole convention came across more specific and a
hell of a lot cleverer. It didn’t hurt that the whole show became more
marketable—Hello, family audience!
With all of these changes made, we regrouped in January at Jason’s (in
Queens, God help us) to read/sing through the first 21 pages. It was a
hugely successful day, and everyone loved the new stuff. The new
prologue worked magnificently and the first scene and song (the new
“Nursery Rhyme Math”) kicked the show off strongly. Everyone agreed that
Jack & Jill The Musical was definitely ready to be shopped and produced.
Well, that should be simple, right?
Are You A Musician Or A Mouse?
Throughout all of the rewrites, Jason had also been working on the
orchestrations and setting up a musicians’ rehearsal just to hear the
score out loud musically. Now, Jason is responsible for the piano and
bass parts, but he had been working with a fabulous drummer, Joe
Choroszewski, in order to create the drum book. For the better part of a
year, Joe had been working on a boat, but with the assistance of tape
recordings and the U.S. postal system, he and Jason had managed to
complete the score.
Jason decided to rent the studio in Jersey (the same one we recorded the
demo in) and found a piano player and bass player to round out the trio
(Joe was on drums). With Jason conducting, they rehearsed and played
through the show without singers. It was brilliant to hear, and really
reiterated the idea that the jazz trio will add an infinite amount of
style and strength to the show. I can’t wait to dress them like mice and
have them sing!
DAT’s A Rap
Currently, Jason and I are preparing materials to submit to the Rusty
Magee Music Project. However, one of the requirements is to submit at least
half of the musical material on a CD or tape. Well, there’s so much new
stuff, we’ve decided that it will be worth making a rough recording of
some of it. We’ve secured a rehearsal studio, Jason’s DAT recorder, and
the cast from the table reading and have a long list that we’ll get
through as much of as we can in five hours. I’ll let you know what
happens.
|